Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/01/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I "know" pretty much what you know, but I lack the experience with incident meters to see what would actually work out best for a series of slides. I understand your point about getting a proper reflective reading and then keeping constant exposure within a given lighting situation. I'm also aware that if a major part of the subject detail is highlight (e.g., white bird), then one might want to decrease the incident or middle grey exposure recommendation by half to whole stop, especially for slide film. I'm not a zonie, but I probably use the concepts when I meter light sand and then open up a stop or stop-and-a-half from the meter recommendation. Thanks very much for your input. Julian ----- Original Message ----- From: "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 10:15 AM Subject: RE: [Leica] BESSA R3A or M7 Julian Koplen wrote: > Hence, I think I'll spring for one of the Digisix-like small > meters that can do incident measurements. Do my assumptions > about more constant slide density with incidents work out that way > in practice? Not in my experience. You can get constant slide density with either reflective or incident, as long as you meter once, and do not change the exposure as long as the light does not change. Even with incident meters, you still need to use your judgment to interpret the light in contrasty situations; in such situations it takes a lot of experience with how your films/paper/digital sensors respond to light to decide where to place the meter. For the most part, I prefer incident meters. However, with media with very narrow latitude in the highlights such as color slides or digital sensors, I sometimes prefer reflective meters and always check the "hot spots". See Dan Cardish's recent allusion to reflectance, summarily dismissed by Karen Nakamura. It appeared that people missed Dan's point, and Dan is too lazy to elaborate. :-) Also, if you do any sort of "zone system", reflective meters are de rigueur, a must. While not a great fan of Ansel Adams, if they are good enough for him, they are good enough for me. :-) Make sure you learn to use any meter properly; reflective or incident. WIth reflective, do not just point to the scene, line up the arrows and shoot. Yeah, yeah I know Ted and his KISS. I am all for KISSing too, but what he didn't tell you is that it takes a lifetime to know where to point the camera before you line up the arrows. That's what I hate about pros. They make it look so darn easy and simple. ;-) At the very least, point the reflective meter at something "middle gray", before you line up the arrows. You can get excellent results with either reflective or incident. Please excuse my ramblings, for I do not know what you do or do not already know. :-) Cheers, - Phong _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information