Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] FOM 2 & LEICA - EOS MARRIED.
From: firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin)
Date: Sun Dec 26 14:39:22 2004
References: <24B94B6A-4F79-11D9-8680-003065B8976C@ucalgary.ca> <A33DAFAE-5269-11D9-9ADF-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <41C7A8FE.8030007@planet.nl> <45275AF0-5350-11D9-9BD0-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <002901c4e770$274938c0$87d86c18@ted> <7597B881-53A4-11D9-9BD0-000A9578C446@ncable.net.au> <001101c4ea05$514d1a00$87d86c18@ted>

Thanks Ted,
Our family christmas was great: all the traditional "northern" 
hemisphere roasts and we all copped a bit of sunburn to boot. Spent 
part of boxing day on the beach and part photographing my nieces. Fun 
fun fun, and happy new year to all.

Cheers
On 25/12/2004, at 9:10 AM, Ted Grant wrote:

> Alastair Firkin said:
> Subject: Re: [Leica] FOM 2 & LEICA - EOS MARRIED.
>
>
>> Great Ted, we have always allowed hybrids, as long as the camera or 
>> lens was Leica. Of course when we started, we had no idea that the 
>> marriage would be between Canon SLR's and Leica, but that's evolution 
>> I suppose.
>> Have a great Christmas and don't forget that voting commitment 
>> ;-)<<<<<
>
> G'day Alastair,
> I trust you're already enjoying your Christmas Day on the future side 
> of the planet ! ;-)
>
> Me? I can hardly wait for the white haired & bearded old fellow to 
> come down the chimney! ;-)
>
> I figure this is the 75th Christmas for me and the excitement of it 
> all is still there! :-) Heck if not, how boring it would be. But I 
> love the children and their excitement at what it is. Worth every 
> minute of watching them during the final days before the big one. :-) 
> You can feel the excitement growing. :-)
>
> Yep when you started FOM2 who would've ever thought we'd see a digital 
> avalanche as we've seen. Let alone the marrying of Leica lenses and 
> Canon digital bodies at the numbers we see these days. Which I think 
> will evolve faster this New Year quicker than the last.
>
> And if you weren't such a common sense logical chap accepting the 
> advances, it would be a shame to discount photography simply because 
> it wasn't a "Leica lens and body." Instead of what we see, a lens mix 
> and match with digital body of these days. Certainly when so many 
> say.."Well it's the lens that counts the most with any Leica camera 
> anyway!"
>
> Not to worry about the voting commitment, I'm as steady as rock and 
> looking forward to this year's selection.
>
> Have a wonderful day and Christmas dinner. Oh you may have already had 
> it! ;-) Therefore I trust it was wonderful.
>
> ted
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
Alastair


In reply to: Message from heintz at ucalgary.ca (John W. Heintz) ([Leica] Daniel's PAW)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Daniel's PAW)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Daniel's PAW)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] Daniel's PAW)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] FOM 2 & LEICA - EOS MARRIED.)
Message from firkin at ncable.net.au (Alastair Firkin) ([Leica] FOM 2 & LEICA - EOS MARRIED.)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] FOM 2 & LEICA - EOS MARRIED.)