Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica
From: lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda)
Date: Wed Dec 22 22:16:18 2004
References: <440b792d0412220843f7c9947@mail.gmail.com><028701c4e84f$ebf949a0$6401a8c0@ ccapr.com> <440b792d0412221040330de195@mail.gmail.com> <p060010a0bdefd90d206a@gpsy.com>

On 23 de dic de 2004, at 3:19, Karen Nakamura wrote:

> 25/2.8 Biogon T*

a 25/2.8 under $1000 sounds good enough for me even if isnt as good as 
they claim.



Saludos
-----------------------------------------
http://imaginarymagnitude.net/blog/


In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)