Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/12/22
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica
From: lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda)
Date: Wed Dec 22 22:16:18 2004
References: <440b792d0412220843f7c9947@mail.gmail.com><028701c4e84f$ebf949a0$6401a8c0@ ccapr.com> <440b792d0412221040330de195@mail.gmail.com> <p060010a0bdefd90d206a@gpsy.com>
On 23 de dic de 2004, at 3:19, Karen Nakamura wrote:
> 25/2.8 Biogon T*
a 25/2.8 under $1000 sounds good enough for me even if isnt as good as
they claim.
Saludos
-----------------------------------------
http://imaginarymagnitude.net/blog/
In reply to:
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)