Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica
From: mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura)
Date: Wed Dec 22 18:17:45 2004
References: <440b792d0412220843f7c9947@mail.gmail.com><028701c4e84f$ebf949a0$6401a8c0@ ccapr.com> <440b792d0412221040330de195@mail.gmail.com>

The test was the:

25/2.8 Biogon T* vs. 24/2.8 Elmarit ASPH
28/2 Biogon T* vs. 28/2  Summicron ASPH
35/2 Biogon T* vs  35/2 Summicron  ASPH
  50/2 Planar vs the 50/2 Summicron

Note that all of the ZI lenses are estimated to be selling in the 
$600-900 range (Y60,000-90,000).  While this makes the Planar only 
so-so against the 50 Summicron, the wides are much cheaper than the 
Leica equivs.  I have the 28/2 on hold myself. I think it'll come out 
in January, production has been delayed for some reason (they were 
originally going to come out in November).

Karen

-- 
Karen Nakamura
http://www.photoethnography.com/ClassicCameras/

Replies: Reply from lmc at interlink.es (Luis Miguel Castañeda) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Reply from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
In reply to: Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)