Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/12/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica
From: rich815 at gmail.com (Richard Sintchak)
Date: Sun Dec 26 07:50:20 2004
References: <440b792d0412220843f7c9947@mail.gmail.com> <028701c4e84f$ebf949a0$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <440b792d0412221040330de195@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 10:40:28 -0800, mehrdad <msadat@gmail.com> wrote:
> B.D, even though ziess has been around for a long time, they are a new
> comer in this format (M)
Why does the mount matter?
Replies:
Reply from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
In reply to:
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)
Message from msadat at gmail.com (mehrdad) ([Leica] New Zeiss lenses compared against Leica)