Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism
From: daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Wed Dec 15 11:23:20 2004
References: <8d.1c47a6d0.2ef1cfec@aol.com> <006801c4e2db$c437e850$58c49253@Korhonen>

Worry ... innocence.

(probably not, but as it stands ...)

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Raimo K wrote:

> So what is this image about and what?s going on there? Only instantaneous
> answers, please.
> All the best!
> Raimo K
> Personal photography homepage at:
> http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <SonC@aol.com>
> To: <lug@leica-users.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 7:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism
>
>
> > Madison:   http://www.leica-gallery.net/wccjr/image-46065.html
> > -----------------------------------------
> >
> > In  a message dated 12/15/2004 11:30:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> > bdcolen@MIT.EDU  writes:
> > Richard Taylor observed that the Gladwell New Yorker article while
> > interesting,
> > had nothing to tell us about "Leica photography" because, after  all,
> > unless a
> > photo is an abstract, we can look at it and instantly know what  it's
> > about
> > and what's going on...Which leads me to  observe....
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism)
Message from raimo.m.korhonen at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism)