Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism
From: r.s.taylor at comcast.net (Richard S. Taylor)
Date: Wed Dec 15 09:56:29 2004
References: <8d.1c47a6d0.2ef1cfec@aol.com>

Thanks.  What a beautiful, beautiful, photograph.  I love it.


>Madison:   http://www.leica-gallery.net/wccjr/image-46065.html
>-----------------------------------------
>
>In  a message dated 12/15/2004 11:30:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
>bdcolen@MIT.EDU  writes:
>Richard Taylor observed that the Gladwell New Yorker article while 
>interesting,
>had nothing to tell us about "Leica photography" because, after  all, 
>unless a
>photo is an abstract, we can look at it and instantly know what  it's about
>and
>what's going on...Which leads me to  observe....
>-------
>
>
>Regards,
>Sonny
>http://www.sonc.com
>Natchitoches,  Louisiana
>Oldest continuous settlement in La Louisiane
>?galit?, libert?,  crawfish 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
Regards,

Dick
Boston MA


In reply to: Message from SonC at aol.com (SonC@aol.com) ([Leica] New Yorker - Now literalism)