Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG
From: daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Mon Dec 13 00:16:28 2004
References: <BDE1C392.39EE0%robinsnes@comcast.net> <B5B849DC-4C67-11D9-AFBE-000A95DD7D76@charter.net>
 
On Sun, 12 Dec 2004, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote:

> Before you jump for a Canon anything printer, have it demonstrate a BW
> print from one of your own negs.

Before you jump for a XYZ anything printer ...

I couldn't agree more. And make sure you look at the prints in various
lights: tungsten, daylight and florescent.

I'm going with MIS Associates carbon inks. No colors, just shades of grey
for C M and Y.

But for color, the printers on the market are great. Simply great.

Daniel


If it can possibly make a serviceable
> BW print that meets your standards of satisfaction, without any
> contamination from the colors cartridges, then go for it.  I doubt that
> it's possible, but I'll gladly stand corrected if I'm wrong.
> S. Dimitrov
In reply to: Message from robinsnes at comcast.net (Roger Skully) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)
Message from s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov) ([Leica] Printer experiences of the LUG)