Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I also use the C/V 21/4 and the way that it particularly impresses me is by not flaring. I used to have the pre-ashperic 21mm Elmarit and the C/V 21 is better at simply not flaring, even in the most flare-prone situations. Bob >I own and use the C/V 21/4 and it's a great lense even if it cost twice as > much. From what I understand it equals or surpasses all pre-ASPH Leica > 21:s. > > Daniel > > > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Mark Rabiner wrote: > >> On 10/1/04 1:04 PM, "Didier Ludwig" <rangefinder@screengang.com> typed: >> >> > I've been explained by Mark Rabiner the other day, that the difference >> > between CV lenses and Leica lenses is the difference between good >> > lenses >> > and great lenses. Check it? :-Didier >> > >> > >> >>> ...and is the C/V 21 f4 REALLY as good as the SA3.4? >> >> >> >> I own and use the CV 21/f4 and it is an excellent lens for it's price. >> >> Regards, >> >> Greg >> > >> > >> I think I said it was the difference between a GREAT lens and a >> SCRUMPDELICIOUS lens. >> >> Mark Rabiner >> Photography >> Portland Oregon >> http://rabinergroup.com/ >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information