Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WTB: 21 f3.4
From: daniel.ridings at edd.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Sun Oct 3 03:24:23 2004
References: <BD832D5D.7551%mark@rabinergroup.com>

I own and use the C/V 21/4 and it's a great lense even if it cost twice as
much. From what I understand it equals or surpasses all pre-ASPH Leica
21:s.

Daniel


On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Mark Rabiner wrote:

> On 10/1/04 1:04 PM, "Didier Ludwig" <rangefinder@screengang.com> typed:
>
> > I've been explained by Mark Rabiner the other day, that the difference
> > between CV lenses and Leica lenses is the difference between good lenses
> > and great lenses. Check it? :-Didier
> >
> >
> >>> ...and is the C/V 21 f4 REALLY as good as the SA3.4?
> >>
> >> I own and use the CV 21/f4 and it is an excellent lens for it's price.
> >> Regards,
> >> Greg
> >
> >
> I think I said it was the difference between a GREAT lens and a
> SCRUMPDELICIOUS lens.
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Photography
> Portland Oregon
> http://rabinergroup.com/
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from robertmeier at usjet.net (robertmeier@usjet.net) ([Leica] WTB: 21 f3.4)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] WTB: 21 f3.4)