Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] BD Colen and the English Language
From: bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)
Date: Sun Sep 19 16:11:59 2004

Oh, pray Marc, but do stuff a sock in it, won't you old fellow? ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of
Marc James Small
Sent: Sunday, September 19, 2004 7:00 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: [Leica] BD Colen and the English Language


At 10:51 AM 9/17/04 -0400, B. D. Colen wrote:
>Well I'm sure glad it's a reliabir camera, but I really wish that it 
>had digital capabilities.
>
>And can someone explain to me how major global companies such as Nikon,

>Leica, and Olympus, can continue in this day and age to produce 
>marketing materials in pideon English? Truly bizarre.


Uh, BD, we normally communicate on the LUG in English.  Just what would
be a "reliabr" camera or "pideon" English?

I presume that you intended to write "reliable" on the first, though the
context is a bit odd, and "pigeon" or, more properly, "pidjin" English
for the second.

Are my surmises accurate?

Marc


msmall@infionline.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh b?s fir gun ghr?s fir!



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from msmall at infionline.net (Marc James Small) ([Leica] BD Colen and the English Language)