Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Because Fuji seems to give better results, but I understand what you're saying. Back before Fuji, film snobs preferred Ilford and Agfa. I guess Kodak seemed synonymous with "snapshots of Ozzie Nelson". Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Jesse Hellman Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2004 9:27 AM To: Leica Users Group Subject: Re: [Leica] Totally OT question about dentists I'm not a dentist but I've talked with a number about the subject. They have mentioned: the standing hunched over, the need for very steady hands, the physical contortions necessary to do the job, and problems with dental insurance. They seem like a fairly content group. Statistics are tricky things. But your post led to your fascinating website. I have a Retina I and a Zeiss Ikon Super Ikonta B and have always regretting passing up a Retina IIIC in the distant past. And why do film snobs eschew Kodak film, execpt for Tri-X? Jesse Karen Nakamura wrote: > > OK, this is an off-topic question except for the fact that dentists seem > to like Leicas. > > Dentists seem to also retire early. Is it true that dentistry is a > particularly tough job? Is the rumor about dentists having the highest > suicide rate true? > > Or do dentists just retire early so that they can actually enjoy all the > Leicas they have bought? > > Just some random thoughts. > > Karen > _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information