Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]There's an obvious analogy to all this: Several decades ago it became apparent that the old sheet film Graphics were becoming obsolete, as photographers gravitated toward rollfilm cameras such as Rolleiflex and the Kodak Medalist. To meet the demands of a changing market, the Graphic folks introduce a rollfilm adaptor. Anyone else on this list ever use the Graphic rollfilm adaptor? Yeah, it did work, but....it sure wasn't a Rolleiflex. Most photographers opted for cameras that were specifically designed for rollfilm. Graphic eventually did produce rollfilm cameras (and a 35 or two), but these paled in comparison with the competition. An adaptor to a Leica will still be an adaptor. Jim Shulman Bryn Mawr, PA -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+jshul=comcast.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of B. D. Colen Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 9:48 AM To: 'Leica Users Group' Subject: RE: [Leica] Why a digital M Reasonable? Switch sensors at "nominal cost?" Come on guys, get real. I wouldn't expect any company to do that - upgrade the firmware for free? Sure. But not the sensor. Face it - what they give you is what you get. And what they're going to give you is going to be VERY pricey and far from ideal. It may be 'good enough' for what you want to do, and the price may not deter you. So buy it and use it in good health. But don't expect anything at a give-away price; don't expect any real innovation; and don't expect a camera that is up to the top digital standards at the time of release. ;-) B. D. -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Leonard J Kapner Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 12:40 AM To: 'Leica Users Group' Subject: RE: [Leica] Why a digital M Bob, This sounds like a reasonable if somewhat complicated approach, but it's not a bad idea if Leica want to stem the tide of defection. But who knows? It may already be too late, as B.D. has recently suggested... Len -- -----Original Message----- From: lug-bounces+ljkapner=cox.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+ljkapner=cox.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Afterswift@aol.com Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:29 PM To: lug@leica-users.org Subject: [Leica] Why a digital M In a message dated 7/12/04 7:23:50 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org writes: << to put it really bluntly, why would anyone in his or her right mind pay 5500K - for example - for an "M" body when for the same amount of money he or she could buy an 8 mpg Canon Eos MkII and an array of Canon's best lenses? >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---- -- -------------- If Leica Solms wants to jump into the digital sea with an M, then let its frames show the standard film lenses with the APS sensor subframes and guarantee to buyers that Leica will update the sensor frame to full 35mm at nominal cost when it becomes available. So the digital M would have modular construction. >From personal experience with the fast D70 and standard Nikkor film >lenses, I found that the APS sized sensor can produce professional quality images. The present full 35mm frame 13MP sensor used in the Kodak 14n leaves a lot to be desired from reports I've read. The Kodak 14n is rather ponderous. Bob _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information