Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Why do you think this is the case? Right now the only full-frame sensor is from Canon and (maybe) Kodak, although reports on that chip are not really very good. I found the PDF on the micro-lenses and the effect on lens performace that came out last week to be interesting and informative. Adam On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:49:45 +0700, Jerry Justianto <jsjgroups@gmail.com> wrote: > That will be a wrong move for Leica publishing the small sensor in > 2006. By that time I think most sensor will be 1:1 like in EOS 1Ds > > JSJ > > > > On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:02:01 +0100, Steve Unsworth > <mail@steveunsworth.co.uk> wrote: > > You could always buy a Nocti if 800 wasn't fast enough ;-) > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org > > [mailto:lug-bounces+mail=steveunsworth.co.uk@leica-users.org] On Behalf > > Of B. D. Colen > > Sent: 11 July 2004 16:46 > > To: 'Leica Users Group' > > Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital M > > > > So we're looking at a magnification factor of 1.37, a top iso of about > > 800, and a price somewhere north of $4500 K? And a new lens that will > > undoubtedly cost more than a couple Ms? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >