Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ron, I find the main shot a bit ho-hum. The situation is nice, but you are too far away and it is too dark -- IMHO. But...the second picture, the one you initially rejected, is a real gem. The fact that it is not totally sharp does not detract at all, indeed it gives the image additional dynamism. Definitely a keeper. Nathan Ron Price wrote: > > They're not my children, though, so I feel no shame... > > My week 19 PAW: > > http://curiousrobot.com/PAWPics/week19.html > > And another item I'd like opinions on: > > http://curiousrobot.com/Extras/worksornot.html > > It was one of those situations where I got excited when I saw it on the > contact sheet, but then when I scanned it full-sized, I thought, "Oh well, a > possibly-great shot marred by technical imperfection," and never touched it > again. Then the other day, a friend of mine (himself a photographer who > knows and values technical skills) saw this in my file browser and loved the > shot despite its imperfections. I'm curious as to what others out there > think of this... Is it worth doing something with, or just a sloppy > snapshot? > > Any thoughts on either of these shots are, as always, appreciated... > > Ron > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl Mobile: +31 630 868 671 http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html