Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted
From: Frank.Dernie at btinternet.com (Frank Dernie)
Date: Sun Apr 11 02:29:09 2004
References: <b02010202-1033-B0BBC6A489E811D880F6000A95C4E7A0@[10.0.1.2]> <4078F072.AD604F42@chello.nl>

In a fit of enthusiasm I bought the Panasonic version - I prefer black 
and the Leica was not in stock. I don't like the EVF at all though it 
does have the benefit for me of not needing a spectacles change to 
review the images. It feels like a camera for a change, I like the 
controls being in the normal places and the results are excellent! 
Still, I am not fond of zoom lenses and they preclude a nice optical 
finder, so I guess I have to wait a bit longer for a digital camera I 
really like. I already prefer digital to film, just not the cameras.
Frank


On 11 Apr 2004, at 08:14, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Thanks for the link, Adam. Lifson's observations regarding the EVF very
> closely mirror my impression when I handled the D2.
>
> Nathan
>
> Adam Bridge wrote:
>>
>> There's a fascinating alternative view of the Dlux 2 posted on 
>> Luminous
>> Landscape at:
>>
>> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/digilux2-2nd.shtml>
>>
>> Ben Lifson's essay is criticsm as opposed to a simple review, the 
>> difference
>> between Pauline Kael and Siskel and Ebbert. I learned something that 
>> I sort of
>> knew but which, by reading it, brought my own responses about the M 
>> into much
>> sharper focus.
>>
>> It's definately worth reading and perhaps as a stepping of point for 
>> debating.
>>
>> I do know one thing - I find I can't do portraiture with my R8 any 
>> more, it's
>> all M. Now I think I understand why and what a digital M would mean 
>> and have to
>> deliver.
>>
>> And I still want a monochrome version. (Sorry, B.D.)
>>
>> Adam
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Leica Users Group.
>> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> -- 
> Nathan Wajsman
> Almere, The Netherlands
>
> e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
> Mobile: +31 630 868 671
>
> http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>


Replies: Reply from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted)
In reply to: Message from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted)
Message from n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted)