[Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted

[n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)]

Thanks for the link, Adam. Lifson's observations regarding the EVF very
closely mirror my impression when I handled the D2.

Nathan

Adam Bridge wrote:
> 
> There's a fascinating alternative view of the Dlux 2 posted on Luminous
> Landscape at:
> 
> <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/digilux2-2nd.shtml>
> 
> Ben Lifson's essay is criticsm as opposed to a simple review, the difference
> between Pauline Kael and Siskel and Ebbert. I learned something that I sort of
> knew but which, by reading it, brought my own responses about the M into much
> sharper focus.
> 
> It's definately worth reading and perhaps as a stepping of point for debating.
> 
> I do know one thing - I find I can't do portraiture with my R8 any more, it's
> all M. Now I think I understand why and what a digital M would mean and have to
> deliver.
> 
> And I still want a monochrome version. (Sorry, B.D.)
> 
> Adam
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html