Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]DaveR said: >>The only drawback I hear regarding the 2200 is the cost of inks.<<<<<<<< Tina replied: > Dave - > That's true!! I'll be getting the 4000, too. The choices for economical > ink would be hooking the 2200 up to a continuous flow ink system or using > the 4000 with big cartridges. The 4000 has the advantage of both black > inks being installed at the same time and the ability to print larger. The > 2200 is a great printer, though. If I continue to use it, I'll get the CFS > and MIS inks.<<<< There isn't any question I've bought the Epson factory 4 times in cost of inks for the 2200. And no matter how incredible it makes prints, the ink cost is a major deterrent to buy. Anytime I'm asked about it I make a very strong point about the ink rip off. So I figure no matter what the 4000 costs I'll pay for it in no time through lack of ink purchases. The 2200? Well we'll see what happens over the next few months and demand for prints. ted - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html