Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Panasonic Lumix DMC-LC1
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:45:17 -0800

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0402/04021305pansonicluminlc1.asp

A peak into the Digilux II?

A Maserati with a Hyundai engine?

With Leica Glass but not quite a full peak into the upcoming Digilux II as
the software is the half of the issue.

In the case of the Digilux I (as if it has that much to do with the Digilux
II) the software in the Panasonic did not cut the mustard. There lies the
rub. A mustard rub. Which could go either way.
The Leica was Liked. The Panasonic was panned.
And might have strangely cost more money than the Leica.

In this new camera which as we know will not be the point and shoot which
the Digilux 1 was but something resembling a real camera but with a CCD
where the pressure plate would be- what Leicas version is of the software
which they put into this camera will be as much an issue as is taking this
Panasonic for a walk around the block.

Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland, Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/Catagorypages/PersonalWork.html




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] quad print question)
Reply from "Sonny Carter" <sonc@www.sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Panasonic Lumix DMC-LC1)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] quad print question)