Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 2003-12-16 <bdcolen@earthlink.net (B. D. Colen)> thoughtfully wrote: >Oh, and btw - Yes, my posted images have been shot with the E-1. You'll >notice I haven't made a bunch of BS claims - I've simply posted what >I've been shooting; just as I've posted my Leica images. Either the >images speak for themselves, or they don't. Same thing goes for the >digilux you're drooling all over - except that the only images are those >OF the digilux, not those taken in the field, under real-world >conditions. ;-) Excuse me, B.D. but I'm not drooling over the Digilux. My sole digital is a D30 and it works just fine for family purposes right now so no Digilux need apply. I'd love to have a digital back for my R8 but at the price point Leica has set I can darn near buy the full-frame Canon that's superior to any "35mm" digital out there. But... Every single time a Leica digital is mentioned on this list you find a way to savage it. Now you're on the Olympus payroll. There's a seemingly obvious connection. I pointed that out. Remember, you savaged Tina for actually liking her Digilux I, couldn't wait to point out that as a result of her liking the product she'd be asked by Leica to make a presentation about it. You don't get it both ways. Adam - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html