Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] New PAW
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:18:10 -0700
References: <053101c3a4af$c82b0340$2501a8c0@chartertn.net> <004401c3a4b4$e1cd9100$ea40b8c7@nsula.edu> <05c201c3a548$89eaca40$2501a8c0@chartertn.net> <009301c3a564$e8761030$fbfea8c0@DHHZSZ11>

> Hi John:
>
> I've been reading this thread on honesty in photography and I don't
think I
> can believe you that the dog only had three legs -- isn't it more
truthful
> to say you "manipulated" the photograph in such a way that only
three of the
> dogs four legs are shown - thus you have given more impact to your
picture?

> Ted

actually the dog had two legs, but he added a leg...it counts as an
extra paw....Steve

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)
In reply to: Message from "John Black" <jblack@ambio.net> ([Leica] New PAW)
Message from "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)
Message from "John Black" <jblack@ambio.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)