Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] New PAW
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 15:56:11 -0800
References: <053101c3a4af$c82b0340$2501a8c0@chartertn.net> <004401c3a4b4$e1cd9100$ea40b8c7@nsula.edu> <05c201c3a548$89eaca40$2501a8c0@chartertn.net> <009301c3a564$e8761030$fbfea8c0@DHHZSZ11> <018201c3a57d$071de2c0$ae70e244@ph.cox.net>
 
Darn - never thought of that, Steve.  Good going.

Ted

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2003 2:18 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] New PAW


> > Hi John:
> >
> > I've been reading this thread on honesty in photography and I don't
> think I
> > can believe you that the dog only had three legs -- isn't it more
> truthful
> > to say you "manipulated" the photograph in such a way that only
> three of the
> > dogs four legs are shown - thus you have given more impact to your
> picture?
> 
> > Ted
> 
> actually the dog had two legs, but he added a leg...it counts as an
> extra paw....Steve
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "John Black" <jblack@ambio.net> ([Leica] New PAW)
Message from "Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)
Message from "John Black" <jblack@ambio.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)
Message from "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] New PAW)