Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re[2]: [Leica] Is digital photography necro-(huh?)
From: Sonny Carter <>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:59:17 -0700
References: <002801c39698$a88fd620$0264a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <> <>

Hello Greg and Rolfe.

Sorry, I was teasing, but the reality is that I shoot Leica IIIf,
Leica M6, and a "Leica Lens" Panasonic.  Every day. Carry at least two
of those every where I go.  I hardly ever talk nuts and bolts cameras
on this list. Not digital, not M6, not IIIf, unless I am answering a
question, or asking a question.

There's lots of bandwidth here.  No one is clogging the LUG, at least
not now.  I might've agreed a couple weeks ago, but for now, the subjects
seem to be mostly about photography.  That is why I am here.

Feels like the discussions are valid, and I would like to point out,
the very thread you are chiming in on is one that a proponent of film

The thread is really about silver halide photography, not digital.


Sunday, October 19, 2003, 7:51:04 PM, you wrote:

GJL> Rolfe Tessem wrote in part:

>> 2. I'm getting really, really tired of all the digital crap clogging
>> up a Leica list. There are plenty of venues for these discussions and
>> this isn't one of them. It almost makes me pine for Alfie Wang. 

GJL> You're not alone! Is there not a digital photographers website out there
GJL> somewhere?

GJL> Regards,

GJL> Greg

GJL> --
GJL> To unsubscribe, see

- -- 
Best regards,

- --
To unsubscribe, see

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <> (RE: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <> (Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)
Message from "Greg J. Lorenzo" <> (Re: [Leica] Is digital photography necrophilia?)