Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Week 3 with the Noct.
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 22:37:09 -0700
References: <3D057927-E1A6-11D7-A65E-00306599C552@earthlink.net> <3F5BF969.4A0FE100@rabinergroup.com>

Mark

I thought that I could understand the English language fairly well, but
I guess I cannot quite get it all.

Jerry

Mark Rabiner wrote:

> Feli di Giorgio wrote:
> >
> > No, I didn't do a direct comparison shoot out. I don't shoot newspapers
> > with my lenses.
> > It's a judgment call from looking at a few prints and scans.
> >
> > feli
> >
> Feli if you're wondering why i got just a tad testy it's because it felt
> wrong to me not in a small way…
>
> Here is out very expensive special glass being…
>
> The fact that i happen to be at odds with what is being said is not the point.
> Or I try not to have it be.
>
> I'm at odds with a DR. being subtly trashed with no back up.
> Plenty of people thing the DR. is the cat's pajamas and would not find
> this credible.
>
> I'm at adds with Summicrons being considered soft by everyone and in
> comparison to the Noct stopped down not that great.
>
> I found both the Summicron during the same test and the Noct at F 11 to
> be as good as it gets. My eyeball, loupe and slide projector lens gets.
> F 1000th of a sec at F11 or 500th or F8 sometimes.
>
> But i don't like the way it was tossed out there like it was a given. I
> think people know you area a Leica expert and would take it too quickly
> to heart. The gear suffers. Yes i do get carried away. The gear's rep.
> suffer's. hows that folks.
> Its straing how an expert on one part of a fiewlds will have his openion
> reverred in other not so related sections.
> A collector vs a shooter as in here.
> Would a very very good collector know how well these things really
> preform more than an average shooter?
>
> I believe my opinion on the "Noct stopped" is backed up by Ted, Erwin
> and others fairly handy to us who can confirm or deny it.
>
> This to me is such an impressive statement:
> > I really need to get a lens release button guard for my M2. With the
> > extra weight of the Noct a good accidental tap on the button WILL
> > release the lens!  It's not a problem on my M6TTL, because of the
> > guard, but I prefer the more accurate 50 framelines of the M2.
>
> I think it helps to know what you've got even if you're not getting paid
> to do it.
> Does one get so much one doesn't care. I think so. That has happened to
> me and happens now.
> I just feel better the more accurate and "scientific" I am about
> evaluating and comparing stuff.
> So I just know I'm not passing off gasps.
>
> Mark Rabiner
> Portland, Oregon USA
> http://www.rabinergroup.com
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Feli di Giorgio <feli2@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Week 3 with the Noct.)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] Week 3 with the Noct.)