Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital Leica M
From: "Buzz Hausner" <buzz.hausner@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2003 21:25:36 -0400

Don, I humbly request that you cite some actual figures to sustain the
statements you make below.  Otherwise, I for one would appreciate
efforts to keep the unsubstantiated assumptions and hyperbole to a
minimum.

	Buzz Hausner

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Don Dory
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:19 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital Leica M

B.D.
As in the past, amateurs or professional wannabees buy the vast majority
of pro stuff.  Example one would be the number of Nikon F's that have
come out of the closet.  Example two, to come on topic, how many
Noctilux's have been purchased by amateurs?  Example three would be the
number of Hasselblads that the professional class bought to take
snapshots with.

0.02

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Digital Leica M)