Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Why not use punch cards for photo archiving?
From: Jim Hemenway <Jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 13:26:01 -0400
References: <200306191743.KAA23887@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <141c01c336f4$0c1c7ea0$31e47d80@KRIEGERLPT> <016001c33631$488c5680$ad04ee80@xyo5pncqiheqc4> <2147483647.1056095567@cambric.reid.org> <007c01c33805$22a77e60$1801000a@basecamp2win>

Punch cards are good.  If you drop em, just sort them back together
using the unique sequence number on each card... easy!

You might need a small garage though, to store the cards needed for each
photograph.
- -- 

Jim - http://www.hemenway.com



Jim Laurel wrote:
> 
> I'm afraid I haven't been as lucky as you, Brian.  I still have alot of
> information on 5.25" floppies, which is lost to me for all practical
> purposes.  I could go out and find a drive and copy things over, but what a
> hassle!  I also have many backup tapes created with Everex tape drives.
> Today, they are totally unreadable without the original tape drive software.
> Finally, I have many files that I created with SMART and ENABLE, two
> programs that I used for general office productivity back in the 80s.
> Again, totally unreadable unless I go and hunt down an old compatible
> version of those software packages, and export my documents into some form
> that a contemporary software program could import.  But it's just too much
> trouble.  I've resigned myself to letting go of the information because I
> can't devote enough time to becoming a digital archivist.  On the other
> hand, I have all my college papers in a file, still readable by any human
> eye.
> 
> -Jim
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Brian Reid" <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Film is Archival
> 
> > Digital can be archival. It's just not automatic yet.
> > I have digital archives that date back to 1967, which is when I first
> started keeping digital information that mattered to me. It is now 36 years
> later, and I still have all of it. Today my digital archives are about
> 100GB; I think that they didn't exceed 10MB until 1970.
> >
> > The "secret" is very simple. Make a copy onto two different media every 5
> years. At least one of those media will still be around in 5 more years, and
> you can repeat the process.
> >
> > Currently my digital archives live in 3 forms:
> > IDE hard drives that are turned off and sealed
> > DVD ROMs (33 ROMs hold everything)
> > DDS3 DAT tapes (10 tapes hold everything)
> >
> > I also keep everything online on regular servers.
> >
> > At some point in the future some new storage technology will come along,
> and I will copy my archives onto that. I suspect that if I die before a
> truly archival technology comes along, my children will have no trouble
> reading any of the archival media and continuing this tradition of copying
> should that be what they want.
> >
> > I also have boxes and boxes of B&W photographic prints processed to be
> archival. Those will outlast the cockroaches.
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Why not use punch cards for photo archiving?)
In reply to: Message from Martin Krieger <krieger@usc.edu> ([Leica] Film is Archival)
Message from "A. Lal" <alal@duke.poly.edu> (Re: [Leica] Film is Archival)
Message from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (Re: [Leica] Film is Archival)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] Film is Archival)