Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Gerry Walden wrote: > > I notice in this months National Geographic that they reckon to use 550 > rolls of film per story. Assuming they use 36 exposure rolls, that means > they shoot close 19,800 frames per story. Based on using about 10 frames per > story for publication, this is a success rate of roughly 0.05%. I think even > I could make that, as could most of us on this board. So are the NatGeo guys > that good or do we just see the very best? Just a passing thought! > > Gerry > > Gerry Walden LRPS > www.gwpics.com > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html Puts a new meaning to the phrase "decisive moment." More like a room full of monkeys typing and eventually they type out "Hamlet." Rounded off to 20,000 frames its 1 out of 2000 shots. 1 shot out of 55 rolls. Almost 2 pro packs a shot. (20 rolls in cellophane) I think I could photograph "dog doo I have known" and have it come out NA quality at that ratio and the images would loose all need for their physical existence but obtain state of pure..... coincidence. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html