Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/08/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] These kids are well and truly Photoshopped
From: "Julian Koplen" <jkoplen@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:31:03 -0400
References: <DAEOKOEHIBMMGOJNOFECAEFNDLAA.phong@metrowerks.com> <3D707CAA.E7BC5A28@bigpond.net.au> <006201c250f3$f07b90a0$e9efe243@5lgcn01> <3D714A29.36FA6F9B@bigpond.net.au>

It more than helped. I appreciate your thoughtfulness as much as I do your
pictures.

Be well.............Julian
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Heyman" <rheyman@bigpond.net.au>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] These kids are well and truly Photoshopped


Hi Julian,

Until recently I used a lot of Kodak T400TCN for its lovely silky-smooth
look,
but I found that I sometimes had to add colour.
http://www.leica-gallery.net/heymanphoto/image-30521.html  and it takes too
long
in Photoshop. Consequently, my thinking is to have the colour available in
the
film, but print in B&W. Then again, I have not had many requests for colour
for
some time. Maybe I should change back. Oooohhh, I'm so confused!

I use Fuji Supeior 400 for quite a lot of my wedding candids and some
portraits,
but I use Fuji NPH for anything I think may need to be enlarged to 20 or 30
inches. It is just a better film and even in B&W it has a greater tonal
range.
Having said that, I often go out with a bag full of superior if I think that
I
may overshoot. The family you like so much has a mixture of NPH and
Superior. I
used the NPH to start on the "real shots" and then used another 3 or 4 rolls
just playing. When a family spends as much time and effort in preparation
for
their portrait session as this one does, and is as loyal a customer as they
are,
I don't stop at any predetermined number of shots. They will come up with a
suggestion and I will add my interpretation and we go for it.

I went back to the same location last week and made notes on the different
locations at various tide times. Because of the very shallow water the beach
stretches out for a mile or so at low tide,
http://www.leica-gallery.net/heymanphoto/image-30492.html   but at half tide
there is a totally different set of locations closer to the beach where I
will
be able to use jetties, mangroves, sea walls and boat ramps. These are the
first
portraits I have ever done in this area, since I live inland nearly an hour
away, However I am now encouraging other clients to make the effort. (Not
too
successfully, I might add) If I can convince some of them to make the
journey I
will post the results to the same site.

The tone in the images is not your imagination, I just add a little in
Photoshop. B&W to me is a little cold and the warm tone adds a little
interest.
It got your attention, didn't it?

Most of these have the the sky burned in considerably to add drama and I
usually
burn the base too, so that the eye will not drop out of the bottom of the
picture.What all this comes down to is that I often darken the whole
picture,
but hold back the centre of interest.

These are not hard and fast rules, I just treat each shot as it comes. Hope
this
helps

Rob

(SNIP PARENT MESSAGE)

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Phong" <phong@metrowerks.com> (RE: [Leica] These kids are well and truly Photoshopped)
Message from Rob Heyman <rheyman@bigpond.net.au> (Re: [Leica] These kids are well and truly Photoshopped)
Message from "Julian Koplen" <jkoplen@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] These kids are well and truly Photoshopped)
Message from Rob Heyman <rheyman@bigpond.net.au> (Re: [Leica] These kids are well and truly Photoshopped)