Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark, P.S. I am using 150ml (1:1 so 300ml total, XTOL plus water) of XTOL for two rolls of 36, so that's 75ml/roll. That's below the "recommended" dose. What has been your experience with that? Regards, Austin > Hi Mark, > > I think it's developer exhaustion. No difference in development > density by > the increase in times! So much for XTOL being able to be stored... I'll > try a new batch in the morning! > > Regards, > > Austin > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mark > > Rabiner > > Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 10:18 PM > > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > Subject: Re: [Leica] Neopan 1600 - image deterioration over time on > > unprocessed film? > > > > > > Austin Franklin wrote: > > > > > > What can anyone tell me about image deterioration, and what to > > do about it > > > (aside from obviously processing shortly after exposure) from > > not processing > > > Neopan 1600 (or even Delta 3200) shortly after exposure? I'm > > looking for > > > factual information and/or personal experience as opposed to > > speculation... > > > Fuji doesn't mention anything in their data sheet that I could see. > > ><Snip> > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Austin > > > > > > > Austin- Neopan 1600 is my main film and i sometimes wait weeks to months > > before i run it and it seems to be perfectly OK. > > The Delta 3200 no on this issue. But the Neopan 1600 is ok. > > > > > > Mark Rabiner > > Portland, Oregon USA > > http://www.markrabiner.com > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html