Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi Mark, I think it's developer exhaustion. No difference in development density by the increase in times! So much for XTOL being able to be stored... I'll try a new batch in the morning! Regards, Austin > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Mark > Rabiner > Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 10:18 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Neopan 1600 - image deterioration over time on > unprocessed film? > > > Austin Franklin wrote: > > > > What can anyone tell me about image deterioration, and what to > do about it > > (aside from obviously processing shortly after exposure) from > not processing > > Neopan 1600 (or even Delta 3200) shortly after exposure? I'm > looking for > > factual information and/or personal experience as opposed to > speculation... > > Fuji doesn't mention anything in their data sheet that I could see. > ><Snip> > > Thanks, > > > > Austin > > > > Austin- Neopan 1600 is my main film and i sometimes wait weeks to months > before i run it and it seems to be perfectly OK. > The Delta 3200 no on this issue. But the Neopan 1600 is ok. > > > Mark Rabiner > Portland, Oregon USA > http://www.markrabiner.com > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html