Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digilux?
From: Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 17:33:50 -0500
References: <4BCC8C3C-405A-11D6-9C84-00050289F09A@sympatico.ca> <3CA3902F.8B70755C@yahoo.com> <3CA4599F.DFF371A1@webshuttle.ch>

Thanks Nathan, everyone
That makes a lot of sense.
I had always thought they were based on 
fujis but with Summarit lenses. I'm sure I can
get lots more features from the Japanese.
Boy, do I have a lot of research to do!
Javier


Nathan Wajsman wrote:
> 
> Javier,
> 
> > Whatever the case, is this camra worth having or should I
> > go
> > for the more popular stuff from Olympus or Canon? Is it overpriced?
> 
> As much as I love Leica, I simply do not see the rationale for spending the
> extra money on a Digilux compared to whatever Fuji model the Digilux is a
> rebadged copy of. Leica's competitive advantage is in optics and analogue
> cameras; if I were shopping for a digital camera I would look to the
> Japanese brands.
> 
> Nathan
> 
> --
> Nathan Wajsman
> Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
> 
> e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
> mobile: +41 78 732 1430
> 
> Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm
> General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- -- 
http://63.164.201.182/

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from William Gower <w_gower@sympatico.ca> ([Leica] Re: Leica B/W digital printing options)
Message from Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com> ([Leica] digilux?)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] digilux?)