Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] digilux?
From: Javier Perez <summarex@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 16:50:39 -0500
References: <4BCC8C3C-405A-11D6-9C84-00050289F09A@sympatico.ca>

Hi
I'm now seriously wanting a digital camera and was looking at the 
digilux 4.3, but have read that it's not a true 4.3mp camera as the
model name would imply
but a 2.4 instead and the 4.3 is a virtual figure concocted from some
intepolation type
enhancement. Whatever the case, is this camra worth having or should I
go
for the more popular stuff from Olympus or Canon? Is it overpriced?
What's the best current deal on digital?
Any advice is super appreciated
Javier

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Alastair Firkin <firkin@ncable.net.au> (Re: [Leica] digilux?)
Reply from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] digilux?)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] digilux?)
In reply to: Message from William Gower <w_gower@sympatico.ca> ([Leica] Re: Leica B/W digital printing options)