Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ted: >It's people like you doing the tough ass act that make it tough for the rest >of us flying photographers who make a living at taking pictures. Here in the US, it's the law that hand inspections are allowed. I see nothing wrong in asserting that your rights be respected. The inspectors don't make the law. They're not allowed to change it, either. http://www.faa.gov/avr/AFS/FARS/far-108.txt > Sec. 108.17 Use of X-ray systems. > (e) No certificate holder may use an X-ray system to inspect carry-on > or checked articles unless a sign is posted in a conspicuous place at > the screening station and on the X-ray system which notifies > passengers that such items are being inspected by an X-ray and advises > them to remove all X-ray, scientific, and high-speed film from > carry-on and checked articles before inspection. This sign shall also > advise passengers that they may request that an inspection be made of > their photographic equipment and film packages without exposure to an > X-ray system. If the X-ray system exposes any carry-on or checked > articles to more than 1 milliroentgen during the inspection, the > certificate holder shall post a sign which advises passengers to > remove film of all kinds from their articles before inspection. If > requested by passengers, their photographic equipment and film > packages shall be inspected without exposure to an X-ray system. This applies to all domestic flights within the US. If some 2-bit security guy doesn't understand his job and his obligations under the law, I think blaming the passenger is misplaced. Eric - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html