Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V22 #38
From: "Aram Langhans" <langhans@yakima-wa.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 05:11:12 -0800
References: <200203051122.DAA17868@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>

> Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 19:41:39 -0800
> From: "Gary Todoroff" <datamaster@humboldt1.com>
> Subject: [Leica] Re: 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro
> Message-ID: <002101c1c3f7$a9dc2580$762d0dce@g4s5g1>
> References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020304211317.02a93600@infoave.net>
>
> > . . .you will appreciate the little extra distance of the 100  macro.  I
> use the 60 a lot for making copy > photos.  You can go wrong with either.
> >
> > Tina
>
> Tina, I have to admit to having also gone wrong with my Leica lenses a
time
> or two as well. I don't have the 60 or the 100, but have definitely taken
> some bad shots with BOTH the 90 Elmarit and 90 Tele-Elmarit. I once even
> wasted most of a roll with the 135 Elmarit, forgetting to take off the
lens
> cap.  Yes, one can even go wrong with Leica lenses, and I for one am happy
> to here that is not my plight alone. Sigh . .  but confession is good for
> the soul, yes?
>

Ah, there IS an adavantage to an SLR after all.

I beleive Tina meant to say you CAN'T go wrong with the choice of either a
60 or 100 Macro.


> Gary Todoroff
> Tree LUGger
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html