Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 19:41:39 -0800 > From: "Gary Todoroff" <datamaster@humboldt1.com> > Subject: [Leica] Re: 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro > Message-ID: <002101c1c3f7$a9dc2580$762d0dce@g4s5g1> > References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020304211317.02a93600@infoave.net> > > > . . .you will appreciate the little extra distance of the 100 macro. I > use the 60 a lot for making copy > photos. You can go wrong with either. > > > > Tina > > Tina, I have to admit to having also gone wrong with my Leica lenses a time > or two as well. I don't have the 60 or the 100, but have definitely taken > some bad shots with BOTH the 90 Elmarit and 90 Tele-Elmarit. I once even > wasted most of a roll with the 135 Elmarit, forgetting to take off the lens > cap. Yes, one can even go wrong with Leica lenses, and I for one am happy > to here that is not my plight alone. Sigh . . but confession is good for > the soul, yes? > Ah, there IS an adavantage to an SLR after all. I beleive Tina meant to say you CAN'T go wrong with the choice of either a 60 or 100 Macro. > Gary Todoroff > Tree LUGger > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html