Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 08:44 PM 3/4/02 +0000, you wrote: >Is it a visible difference in photos taken by 60/2.8 or 100/2.8 macro R >lenses? >According to many reviews both are great performers. 100/2.8 macro is a >newer design. Does anyone has or had both and can tell me a photo >differences, if any? >I know, there is a difference in price, weight, distance from subject to >lens in max magnification… > >Thank you, >Victor Victor - I have them both and use them both. They are wonderful lenses. The 100 Macro is really special and if you can only afford one, I would get that one first. It is a lot heavier than the 60, however, so if weight is a consideration, keep that in mind. For most things that you want to take a macro photo of, you will appreciate the little extra distance of the 100 macro. I use the 60 a lot for making copy photos. You can go wrong with either. Tina Tina Manley, ASMP http://www.tinamanley.com images available from http://www.pdiphotos.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html