Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro
From: "Gary Todoroff" <datamaster@humboldt1.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2002 19:41:39 -0800
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020304211317.02a93600@infoave.net>

> . . .you will appreciate the little extra distance of the 100  macro.  I
use the 60 a lot for making copy > photos.  You can go wrong with either.
>
> Tina

Tina, I have to admit to having also gone wrong with my Leica lenses a time
or two as well. I don't have the 60 or the 100, but have definitely taken
some bad shots with BOTH the 90 Elmarit and 90 Tele-Elmarit. I once even
wasted most of a roll with the 135 Elmarit, forgetting to take off the lens
cap.  Yes, one can even go wrong with Leica lenses, and I for one am happy
to here that is not my plight alone. Sigh . .  but confession is good for
the soul, yes?

Gary Todoroff
Tree LUGger

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro)
In reply to: Message from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] 60/2.8 vs 100/2.8 R macro)