Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?
From: Ray Moth <ray_moth@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:27:56 -0800 (PST)

Mark Rabiner wrote:

Ray Moth wrote:
> 
> Thanks for your responses to this question; you've satisfied my
> curiosity! The consensus seems to be that the 50 Summilux-M is a very
> respectable lens but that it doesn't attract much comment these days
> because it's been around, relatively unchanged, for so many years.
> 

The made it focus closer. That's a big change!
======================================================================

True (I did say "relatively" unchanged), but it's not the sort of
change that would excite much comment.

Regards,

=====
Ray

"The trouble with resisting temptation is
 you never know when you'll get another chance!"

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?)