Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/01/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:05:06 -0800
References: <20020117042756.89204.qmail@web9106.mail.yahoo.com>

Ray Moth wrote:
> 
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
> Ray Moth wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for your responses to this question; you've satisfied my
> > curiosity! The consensus seems to be that the 50 Summilux-M is a very
> > respectable lens but that it doesn't attract much comment these days
> > because it's been around, relatively unchanged, for so many years.
> >
> 
> The made it focus closer. That's a big change!
> ======================================================================
> 
> True (I did say "relatively" unchanged), but it's not the sort of
> change that would excite much comment.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> =====
> Ray
> 
Well it's the main reason i didn't get it 8 years ago as my first lens.


Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.markrabiner.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Ray Moth <ray_moth@yahoo.com> ([Leica] Re: Is the 50 Summilux-M the poor cousin?)