Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Better than an slr...
From: "Dan Post" <dpost@triad.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 09:32:36 -0400
References: <32C08861F246D411A8A900805FBE3F0CB30B43@s99mail01.okdhs.org>

Jim-
questioning whether the Wetzlar (or Solms) lenses are better than the
Canadian might result in another food fight here. The consensus seems to be
that the Canadian lenses are every bit as good if not better then the German
copies- and considering that ELCAN developed the Noctilux, and Lord only
knows how many satelite lenses, they might actually have an edge!!!
The Canadian Elves might be a bit more adept than the Solmische Gnomes! (I
say that because of the vast number of Canadian LUGgers who would otherwise
stop the Molson shipmenst South!!! :o)  )
You will find that even the old Leica glass is not bad- it is not that it is
inferior, it can just be --- different, and pleasantly so, and the new stuff
can often outperform most of the film that we choose to shoot with!
Dan (We're not worthy, We're not worthy) Post
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Gumm, Jim" <Jim.Gumm@okdhs.org>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 5:27 PM
Subject: [Leica] Better than an slr...


> I take better pictures with a Leica rangefinder than with an SLR
because...I
> Leica the glass!
> I used to not buy into the idea that Leitz glass was any better than
Canon,
> Nikon, etc...but, I do now. I finally have become more acutely aware of
> these differences after shooting both for many years and evaluating
> negatives, chromes and B+W. There is a certain pictoral quality that goes
> beyond resolution. Leitz glass does have great acutance, but also a
certain
> 3 dimensional effect in some of their wide angles (35 Summilux pre-asph),
> that translates into better looking prints. Prints from other lenses seem
to
> have a slight 'veil' when directly compared to Leitz lenses, and mine have
> all come from Canada ,imagine what a Wetzlar lens would do. ;^) maybe this
> 'veiling effect' comes from zooms with so many elements or maybe its the
> plastic lenses in there. I am interested in what image stabilization has
to
> offer, but I cringe when I think of another 8 or 10 elements in there, not
> helping optically.
> Still waiting for some vulcanite, it must be dear to Leica users out
there.
> Jimbo
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "SonC (Sonny Carter)" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Better than an slr...)
In reply to: Message from "Gumm, Jim" <Jim.Gumm@okdhs.org> ([Leica] Better than an slr...)