Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/08/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2001 11:37:38 -0700
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJOEJMKNAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <OE36w46E3uf21nc4tUG000051cb@hotmail.com> <3B6859FB.739EA9ED@istate.net> <OE13C3hSsxLtBH49KOl00003210@hotmail.com> <3B686210.C3E0C3@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <OE696dgo2S3AXXEjK9T000055c6@hotmail.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20010802172628.03cb3c80@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20010803064646.02d35930@pop.alink.net>
Jim Brick wrote:
>
> At 12:43 AM 8/3/01 -0700, Andrew Schroter wrote:
> >And what do you see?
>
> Duh! Grain.
>
> Jim
the brushstroke of photography!
Man Ray
darn it! out of turpentine!
In reply to:
Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
Message from Jim Brick <jim@brick.org> ([Leica] Re: Re: Leica Quality versus Medium Format)