Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 20:08:05 +0200
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJOEJMKNAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
 
Austin writes:

> It depends on what you mean by "leading".  Sure,
> more people shoot 35mm than MF, no doubt...

That's what I meant.

> ... but not because of purely image quality,
> which is probably reasonably indistinguishable
> in 4x6 prints done at a local mini-lab.

You are making my point, namely, that 35mm quality is already adequate for
almost all purposes.  Heck, even digital quality is adequate for a lot of
purposes.
Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@istate.net> (Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)
 In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)