Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> If the difference were so consistently obvious and large, 35mm > would not be > the > leading format today. Er, huh? It depends on what you mean by "leading". Sure, more people shoot 35mm than MF, no doubt...but not because of purely image quality, which is probably reasonably indistinguishable in 4x6 prints done at a local mini-lab. The difference in a 20x24 shot with high end 35mm vs high end MF IS consistently obvious and large... Of course, assuming proper exposure, same film, proper development, and proper printing. What ever "proper" means ;-)