Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: ODDS and ends
From: "Dante A. Stella" <dante@umich.edu>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 08:33:07 -0500
References: <3ADE2077.9000603@earthlink.net> <B7038E7F.1079F%jbcollier@home.com> <v04011707b703f1980dc4@[32.101.147.186]> <q7dtdt82ftouio0snju20o24cf4u2p7nkm@4ax.com>

brougham3@yahoo.com wrote:

> I question the value of AE if your only metering mode is center-weighted.
> If light conditions aren't changing rapidly, it would be much easier to
> meter once and forget about it.

Since you can't do anything but that with an M6?  You can do that with an AE
camera, if you are so included.  The nice thing about the Hexar (well, among
others) is that in  manual, the shutter readout shows you how many stops off of
the meter reading your manual setting is.  It also tells you how fast or slow
the speed is, and by moving it around you can determine the contrast range.
These are things that the M6 does not do, at least not without a Zone VI meter
in your other hand.


> When it comes time to print, it's easier to
> print a series that look like they belong together if they were exposed the
> same.  If each differs by 1/3 stop, that's going to be a pain in the
> darkroom.  Or computer room.  :)
>

Not true.  I regularly print negs from my GA645 which differ by 1/3, 2/3 up to
3 stops in recorded exposure (which it prints below the frame) between
different types of scenes and they all come out to within a very small margin
in printing (like 1 second out of 7, maximum).  Even smaller margin with the
RF.  When was the last time you could print 30 medium format negatives in one
hour?  I also regularly scan Hexar RF negatives (some of which have appeared in
my PAW selections, and they never require any exposure or contrast adjustment
at all after you make one calibration (film base).

> If light conditions *are* changing rapidly, you'll probably want something
> more sophisticated than center-weighted metering.  AE center-weighted just
> seems to be the worst of both worlds.

Maybe to someone who doesn't use it.  I think centerweighted manual with
match-needles is far worse than using an AE camera with shutter readout.  I
thought that match-needle (diode) was bad on the Pentax K1000, and I found it
not much better on my M6.  And why would any more "sophisticated" system be any
better than letting an AE system roll with the punches (rather than using the
lock?)

Dante

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> ([Leica] ODDS and ends)
Message from John Collier <jbcollier@home.com> (Re: [Leica] ODDS and ends)
Message from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] ODDS and ends)
Message from brougham3@yahoo.com ([Leica] Re: ODDS and ends)