Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2000/12/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Ansel Adams
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 15:45:21 -0800
References: <B65153C2.6416%john@pinkheadedbug.com> <4.1.20001204090014.018176d0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com> <5.0.1.4.0.20001204162302.01b71c60@206.34.200.40>
MEBerube wrote:
>
> Well put. I agree. Thanks for saying that which I wanted to far more
> eloquently than I could have.
> I think it is also that AA had a different photographic eye than most
> LUGgers. (NOT better, just different.)
>
> The f/64 Group ideal isn't something that we likely pursue with a Noctilux
> and M3.
>
maybe we should get a manifesto together and start the F/1 group!
"first in handheld no light photography"
mark rabiner
:)
In reply to:
Message from Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn)
Message from MEBerube <MEB@goodphotos.com> (Re: [Leica] Re:Ansel Adams)