Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Ansel Adams
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 15:45:21 -0800
References: <B65153C2.6416%john@pinkheadedbug.com> <4.1.20001204090014.018176d0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com> <5.0.1.4.0.20001204162302.01b71c60@206.34.200.40>

MEBerube wrote:
> 
> Well put. I agree. Thanks for saying that which I wanted to far more
> eloquently than I could have.
> I think it is also that AA had a different photographic eye than most
> LUGgers. (NOT better, just different.)
> 
> The f/64 Group ideal isn't something that we likely pursue with a Noctilux
> and M3.
> 


maybe we should get a manifesto together and start the F/1 group!

"first in handheld no light photography"

mark rabiner
:)

In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn)
Message from MEBerube <MEB@goodphotos.com> (Re: [Leica] Re:Ansel Adams)