Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Ansel Adams
From: MEBerube <MEB@goodphotos.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Dec 2000 16:28:51 -0500
References: <B65153C2.6416%john@pinkheadedbug.com> <4.1.20001204090014.018176d0@xsj02.sjs.agilent.com>

Well put. I agree. Thanks for saying that which I wanted to far more 
eloquently than I could have.
I think it is also that AA had a different photographic eye than most 
LUGgers. (NOT better, just different.)

The f/64 Group ideal isn't something that we likely pursue with a Noctilux 
and M3.

Carpe Luminem,
Michael E. Berube
http://GoodPhotos.com

At 12:50 PM 12/4/00 -0800, Jim Brick wrote in part:
>Photographs do not in any way have to be about something, they can "of"
>something with equal force. What would I choose to look at every day, a man
>jumping over a puddle or an Ansel Adams masterpiece?
>
>I'll choose AA for sure.

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re:Ansel Adams)
In reply to: Message from Johnny Deadman <john@pinkheadedbug.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn)
Message from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: Ansel Adams/John Wimberley WAS Mapplethorpe, highquailty porn)