Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/11/24
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Stephen Gandy wrote >>> yes, more fact finding is needed. That is why Mike advised photog interested in the subject to test their own lenses and come up with their own conclusions. What you, or I, or Mike, think about bokeh of OTHER photog's lenses is unimportant. What the individual photog thinks of the bokeh of THEIR OWN lenses in their own camera bag is important. If others don't see exactly what another photog sees, so what? <<<< Stephen, I believe Erwin is interested in quantifying what is generally discussed in a qualitative way. Which is why he talks about _repeatable_ experiments. If they were repeatable and verifiable, his results would apply to anybody's lenses. The whole thrust of Erwin's site and contributions to the LUG is to get away from enthusiatic handwaving and into the realm of data. Which may or may not be anyone's cup of tea, of course. Rob.