Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Simon, You still have to account for subject reflectance for some extraordinary situations. For example, an incident reading taken on a brightly lit snowfield (or a beach) will end up giving you overexposure, because it reflect more light than a "normal" subject, so you need to stop down a bit more. Conversely, an incident reading taken on a black lava field on the Big Island will give you underexposure, because it reflects less than a "normal" subject, so you have to open up a bit. But as you say, for most subjects the incident meter does the job. Chuck Albertson Seattle, Wash. - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2000 9:06 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Incident Metering - resources needed > Mark > > Why is the real issue knowing how much light the subject is reflecting? The > whole point of incident metering is you dispense with vagaries of the meter > et al. It doesn't matter how much light the subject is absorbing as long as > you know how much is falling on it. For most general situations the > incident meter works. Are you saying that you still make adjustments after > incident metering depending upon the reflectance of the subject? Given you > are vastly more experienced than me in matters photographic, what type of > adjustments for what type of subjects would you make? > > Simon > > Mark Rabiner wrote: > snip: > > > Not sure i go along with all of that. > > But it's always to know how much light you've got. > > Despite the real issue being how much light is your subject reflecting. > > Just like my pappy used to tell me: > > Rich or poor it's nice to have money. > > >