Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark R> On what basis would you say the Hexar RF is of a poorer quality than the Leica M? Again, based on real data. No one has still answered my question: On what objective basis is the M6 better than the Hexar RF, and history, conjecture and mystique don't count. Tom >Robert Jagitsch wrote: >> >> > >> >Let's not blur the differentiation between accessories and a lens; >> >Or a camera. >> >Hexars are not a treat. >> >It's just obnoxious hearing about them as if they are anywhere close >> >to being in >> >the same league as an M6. Those statements involve even more >>intense blurring. >> >Does the fact that the Hexar is so amazingly overpriced fool some >>people? If >> >they cost half what they cost I might even consider one. >> > >> >> Did anyone say they were in the same league? Not that I'm aware of. >> They are just a viable alternative, and a tool. And if the Hexar is >> overpriced, what does that make Leica gear, ultraoverpriced? LOL >> >> -R > >no they in effect said they were better. >Mark W. Rabiner >:) Thomas Kachadurian - ------------------- www.kachadurian.com