Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] My last word on RF
From: Thomas Kachadurian <>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 21:29:33 -0400
References: <> <v04210102b5e58c5c56c2@[]> <> <a0500190fb5e59fdc3347@[]> <>

Mark R>

On what basis would you say the Hexar RF is of a poorer quality than 
the Leica M? Again, based on real data.

No one has still answered my question: On what objective basis is the 
M6 better than the Hexar RF, and history, conjecture and mystique 
don't count.


>Robert Jagitsch wrote:
>> >
>> >Let's not blur the differentiation between accessories and a lens;
>> >Or a camera.
>> >Hexars are not a treat.
>> >It's just obnoxious hearing about them as if they are anywhere close
>> >to being in
>> >the same league as an M6. Those statements involve even more 
>>intense blurring.
>> >Does the fact that the Hexar is so amazingly overpriced fool some 
>>people? If
>> >they cost half what they cost I might even consider one.
>> >
>> Did anyone say they were in the same league? Not that I'm aware of.
>> They are just a viable alternative, and a tool.  And if the Hexar is
>> overpriced, what does that make Leica gear, ultraoverpriced? LOL
>> -R
>no they in effect said they were better.
>Mark W. Rabiner

Thomas Kachadurian
- -------------------

In reply to: Message from "Dances_with Leicas" <> ([Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Thomas Kachadurian <> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Mark Rabiner <> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Robert Jagitsch <> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Mark Rabiner <> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)