Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] My last word on RF
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 14:02:13 -0700
References: <F55F2geGhRA9kO3JLQf0000375f@hotmail.com> <v04210102b5e58c5c56c2@[216.93.35.52]>

Thomas Kachadurian wrote:
> 
> Jim:
> 
> Good point of both Metz and Heliopan. My point was you can put
> product made by other than Leica under, on, or in front of your Leica
> and not be hit by lightening. I don't get why the Hexar is such a
> threat to so many.
> 
> Tom
> 
Let's not blur the differentiation between accessories and a lens;
Or a camera.
Hexars are not a treat. 
It's just obnoxious hearing about them as if they are anywhere close to being in
the same league as an M6. Those statements involve even more intense blurring. 
Does the fact that the Hexar is so amazingly overpriced fool some people? If
they cost half what they cost I might even consider one.
Mark W. Rabiner
:)

Replies: Reply from Robert Jagitsch <robertj@powerlogix.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
In reply to: Message from "Dances_with Leicas" <m6ttl72@hotmail.com> ([Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Thomas Kachadurian <tom@kachadurian.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)