Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] My last word on RF
From: Robert Jagitsch <robertj@powerlogix.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2000 16:21:49 -0500
References: <F55F2geGhRA9kO3JLQf0000375f@hotmail.com> <v04210102b5e58c5c56c2@[216.93.35.52]> <39BFEB56.65CE4162@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
 
>
>Let's not blur the differentiation between accessories and a lens;
>Or a camera.
>Hexars are not a treat.
>It's just obnoxious hearing about them as if they are anywhere close 
>to being in
>the same league as an M6. Those statements involve even more intense blurring.
>Does the fact that the Hexar is so amazingly overpriced fool some people? If
>they cost half what they cost I might even consider one.
>

Did anyone say they were in the same league? Not that I'm aware of. 
They are just a viable alternative, and a tool.  And if the Hexar is 
overpriced, what does that make Leica gear, ultraoverpriced? LOL

- -R
Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
 In reply to: Message from "Dances_with Leicas" <m6ttl72@hotmail.com> ([Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Thomas Kachadurian <tom@kachadurian.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] My last word on RF)